Help improve this portfolio

Allow session replay and heatmaps through Microsoft Clarity. This helps identify friction and missed content. Sensitive page content is masked, and structured portfolio measurement remains separate.

Skip to main content
Garry BurnsContact
← All experience

Kerzner International · 2024 – Present

A shared language for guest value, across three luxury brands

Brand, CRM, operations, data and finance had no common way to argue for the same guest. This gave them one: a lifecycle, a set of needs and an operating rhythm that connect guest experience to commercial outcomes across One&Only, Atlantis and SIRO.

HospitalityUAEGlobal

Quick read

How guest value connected strategy, governance and delivery

My role
Service Design & Value Enablement Consultant
Key decision
The central trade-off was short-term property or channel wins versus a portfolio-wide relationship model.
Evidence
The work supported the group’s 3-year strategy and connected six strategic objectives to 24 group-level targets and a quarterly delivery roadmap.

At a glance

  • A teaching-for-adoption playbook uniting a six-stage stakeholder lifecycle, six stakeholder needs and seven value-generation phases
  • An operating rhythm of unified backlog, shared OKRs, team-of-teams prioritisation, showcases and outcome reviews
  • Shaped the concept for an Experience & Innovation Management Office
  • Supported the group's 3-year, Board-level strategy

Project snapshot

Interactive value-generation lifecycle showing seven sequential phases from discovery to measurement, with detail on focus, activities, outputs, tools, governance and teams per phase
The value-generation lifecycle as leadership sees it: seven phases from discovery to measurement, each with its focus, activities, outputs, governance and owners. Taken from the interactive strategy site built for Kerzner (contents shown anonymised).

Scope and attribution

Engagement summary

My role
Service Design & Value Enablement Consultant
Duration
Retained engagement · 2024 – Present
Mandate
Create a shared way to connect guest value, commercial priorities, organisational ownership and delivery across One&Only, Atlantis and SIRO, then make the group’s 3-year strategy usable as a working product.
Team and collaborators
Brand, commercial, digital, CRM, sales, revenue, operations, data and finance stakeholders across the group and brand portfolio.
What I owned
The playbook architecture, stakeholder and value models, value-generation lifecycle, governance canvases, operating rhythm and the design and build of the interactive strategy site.
What others owned
Kerzner leaders owned strategic choices, investment approval, operating adoption and delivery within their functions and brands.
Constraints
Three distinct luxury brands, commercially sensitive material, fragmented ownership and an engagement that is still active.
Status
Playbook and strategy product delivered; adoption continues. The Experience & Innovation Management Office remains a funded-decision proposal, not a completed implementation.

Evidence and confidentiality

The client context and workshop photography are real. Strategy screens are anonymised and no confidential commercial performance data is shown.

The challenge

Kerzner International, the group behind One&Only, Atlantis and SIRO, had no shortage of ambition. But activity was spread across brand, commercial, digital, CRM, sales, revenue and operations stakeholders, each with their own priorities, language and measures of success.

The predictable problems followed: effort concentrated on short-term wins rather than long-term roadmaps, work prioritised by urgency rather than enduring commercial value, and promising initiatives stalling between phases because nobody owned the handover. Teams needed a common language for outcomes, ownership, progression and measurement.

The approach

I designed a commercial value-enablement playbook built on three fixed concepts. A stakeholder lifecycle describes the relationship from first awareness to renewed engagement: discover, consider, commit, experience, remember, rediscover. A research-based model of six stakeholder needs, from control and confidence through to meaning and connection, describes the kind of value that matters most at each point. A value-generation lifecycle then shows how the organisation progresses work internally: frame, intent, assess, design, prepare, execute, measure.

Combining the external lifecycle with the internal phases produces a matrix that makes every piece of work precise: which stage of the relationship it improves, which need it serves, and how mature the organisation's response is. Around the model, I designed the operating rhythm to run it, including a unified backlog, shared objectives and key results, team-of-teams prioritisation, progress showcases and outcome reviews. Governance canvases, role lanes and RACI logic keep ownership clear. The framework was pressure-tested against real scenarios including MICE, weddings, resort openings, branded residences and wellness-led propositions.

Outputs delivered

Commercial value-enablement playbookStakeholder lifecycle modelSix-needs value modelValue-generation phasesLifecycle-by-phase matrixGovernance canvas, role lanes & RACI logicOperating rhythm & unified backlogScenario cardsInteractive strategy site

In practice

Entity and stakeholder structure showing a holdings company for guardrails and oversight, and a group company split into operating and property divisions
Making the organisational logic legible: holdings for guardrails and oversight, one group for guest and commercial value delivery, with brand equity and asset equity divisions side by side.
OKR framework with six strategic objectives and twenty-four group-level targets, each with live progress tracking
Six strategic objectives cascading into 24 group-level targets, with live progress against each, so Board ambition and team delivery read from the same page.
Quarterly delivery roadmap showing strategic initiatives with milestone-level progress tracking
The delivery roadmap by quarter: strategic initiatives with milestone-level status, connecting the 3-year ambition to what ships next.
Cross-functional team working through printed material around a boardroom table
Brand, CRM and operations in the same room, working the same material.

Organisational outcomes

Kerzner gained a reusable way to align teams around human needs, commercial value and organisational readiness. Written to teach for adoption rather than sit on a shelf, the playbook strengthened the operating model, clarified ownership and improved commercial prioritisation across brand, CRM, operations, data and finance, and it shaped the concept for an Experience & Innovation Management Office connecting guest and employee experience to Board-level targets (currently pending budget approval).

The work also supported development of the group's 3-year strategy. To make that strategy legible and usable across the organisation, I designed and built an interactive strategy site: vision, entity structure, operating model, value-generation lifecycle, cascading OKRs and delivery roadmap, navigable in one place rather than buried in decks.

Business / customer evidence

  • The work supported the group’s 3-year strategy and connected six strategic objectives to 24 group-level targets and a quarterly delivery roadmap.
  • The work demonstrates adoption of a shared operating language, governance structure and strategy product. It does not claim attributable guest-metric or revenue uplift while the engagement remains active.

Decision / trade-off

The central trade-off was short-term property or channel wins versus a portfolio-wide relationship model. The work prioritised a reusable group framework while pressure-testing it against real scenarios so it did not become abstract governance.

What I learned / next

A strategy becomes more useful when the operating logic is designed with the narrative. My next focus is measuring how consistently the lifecycle, ownership and review rhythms are used across live portfolio decisions.

Continue exploring

Start a conversation

See a similar decision in your organisation?

Tell me where the evidence, ownership or implementation is getting stuck. I can help assess whether the approach in this case fits your context.